Voyeur

Description:Another English case in , R v Wilkins , [29] [30] resulted in a man who filmed his intercourse with five of his lovers for his own private viewing, being sentenced to imprisonment for eight months and ordered to sign the Sex Offenders Register, where his name would remain for ten years. In that case, in , the Supreme Court of Canada held that courts could not criminalize voyeurism by classifying it as a breach of the peace and that Parliament would have to specifically outlaw it. More recent research shows that, compared to the general population, voyeurs were moderately more likely to have psychological problems, use alcohol and drugs, and have higher sexual interest generally. The defendant pleaded guilty. Singapore sentences technologically-enabled voyeurs to a maximum punishment of one year's jail and a fine under the context of insulting a woman's modesty. In the United Kingdom , for example, non-consensual voyeurism became a criminal offence on May 1, There is very little research done on voyeurism in women, so very little is known on the subject.

Views: 1540 Date: 2018-06-09 Favorited: 50